God`s Law in Old Testament

When Paul spoke of the law, he was talking about circumcision. and not the moral laws that are the 10 commandments. As Jesus said, not a single line will be deleted. Throughout the New Testament, for example, Jesus spoke of honoring mother and father, committing adultery, making money, loving G-d, and loving neighbor, which sums up all the commandments. I read the Bible (all the bea) and wrote papers, it seemed that every day, serving mass during and after school (at the time, they went to class and let the old boys serve for a funeral or something like that (and we got a tip, yay) for 12 years straight. I moved to university and now that I`m « older, » I have a question. They (the people and the Bible) always talk about the Jews and the prophets and Abraham and Noah and Moses and Ezekiel and so on. Patience with me because I have forgotten many things in the last 40 years, but how is it that God saves the Jews and not the other peoples and never really says that there is a beautiful Egyptian family with a few children who are just trying to survive, but it seems that God beats them too. And I know that Jesus came to save ALL PEOPLE PAST AND PRESENT, because at that time they seem to be « strangers » (for lack of a better word) and they may have been good people. To go further, I never hear countless references to the Asian population. It is as if, according to man and the Bible, they never existed.

And I come here because when I was in Catholic school, I was kind of told that God had done this and that and wasn`t questioning. But my work friends, who are Asian, don`t believe in Jesus or God. So why are only some people mentioned in the Bible and the only ones who are saved, especially if (at the time) only the Old Testament is used? Thanks for reading. God bless James Thank you for your question, the problem is still confusing today. Old Testament and New Testament. I think it`s good to follow everyone. The term appears 15 times in the Hebrew Bible, 7 times in the New Testament and several times in the Second Temple period in intertestamentary, rabbinic, and patristic literature. Jesus did not abolish the moral and ethical laws that had been in place since the time of Moses. He affirmed and expanded these principles, but He said that obedience must come from the heart (attitudes and intentions) and not just from the technical observance of the letter of the Law (Matthew 5:21-22, 27-28, 31-32, 33-34, 38-42, 43-44, etc.). The passage is virtually identical to Exodus 20:1-17, except for grammatical variations, except for some differences in the fourth (Sabbath), fifth (honor mother and father), and tenth (covet) commandments. Interestingly, the variations in these commandments relate specifically to work.

We will repeat the commentary on the Exodus and the Work here, with additions that examine the differences between the accounts of the Exodus and Deuteronomy. I have a specific criticism of the article, which says, « Jesus was often accused by the Pharisees of violating ceremonial law. » This is misleading and implies that Jesus actually broke a ceremonial point of God`s law, in which case He would NOT have been sinless. The Pharisees accused him FALSELY or of not following the « traditions » of the oral law, for example, washing his hands mentioned in Matthew 15. The workplace is one of the most common areas of adultery, not necessarily because adultery occurs in the workplace itself, but because it results from working conditions and relationships with co-workers. So the first application in the workplace is literal. Married people should not have sex with people other than their spouse during or because of their work. Some professions, such as prostitution and pornography, almost always violate this commandment, as they almost always require sexual relations between people married to others. But any work that undermines the bonds of marriage violates the seventh commandment. This can happen in many ways. Work can foster strong emotional bonds between employees without adequately supporting their obligations to their spouses, as can be the case in hospitals, entrepreneurial businesses, academic institutions and churches, among others.